While
under contract to the United States
Navy in the late 1940s, Wallace H. Coulter
developed a technology of counting and
sizing particles. The technology was
principally developed to count blood
cells quickly. Presently over 98% of
automated cell counters incorporate
the Coulter principle. In the past fifty
years, the technology has also been
utilized to characterize thousands of
different industrial particulate materials
as well. Any instrument utilizes this
principle is commonly called a Coulter
Counter. Coulter Counter is also a registered
trademark. Drugs, pigments, fillers,
toners, foods, abrasives, explosives,
clay, minerals, construction materials,
coating materials, metals, filter materials,
and many others have all been analyzed
by the Coulter principle. It can be
used to measure any particulate material
that can be suspended in an electrolyte.
Particles as small as 0.4 µm and
as large as 1200 µm in diameter
can routinely be measured. Over the
years, Coulter Counter has become the
synonym for particle characterization
technology in many fields. Over 8000
references to the uses of this technology
have been documented.
In a Coulter counter, a tube with a
small aperture on the wall is immersed
into a beaker that contains particles
suspended in a low concentration electrolyte.
Two electrodes, one inside the aperture
tube and one outside the aperture tube
but inside the beaker, are placed and
a current path is provided by the electrolyte
when an electric field is applied (Figure
1). The impedance between the electrodes
is then measured. The aperture creates
what is called a “sensing zone."
Particles in low concentration, suspended
in the electrolyte, can be counted by
passing them through the aperture. As
a particle passes through the aperture,
a volume of electrolyte equivalent to
the immersed volume of the particle
is displaced from the sensing zone.
This causes a short-term change in the
impedance across the aperture. This
change can be measured as a voltage
pulse or a current pulse. The pulse
height is proportional to the volume
of the sensed particle. If constant
particle density is assumed, the pulse
height is also proportional to the particle
mass. This technology thus is also called
aperture technology.
Using count and pulse height analyzer
circuits, the number of particle and
volume of each particle passing through
the sensing zone can be measured. If
the volume of liquid passing through
the aperture can be precisely controlled
and measured, the concentration of the
sample can be determined. In modern
Coulter Counters, such as Beckman Coulter’s
MS 3 instruments, pulses are digitized
and saved with several key parameters
that describe each pulse such as pulse
height, pulse width, time stamp, pulse
area, etc. These parameters will allow
instrument to better discriminate between
noise and real pulses and between normal
pulses and distorted pulses due to various
reasons when particles transit through
the aperture. The saved pulses can be
also used to monitor sample changes
over the measurement time period if
pulses are arranged in time sequence.
In practice, the particle volume is
often represented in terms of equivalent
spherical diameter. The measured particle
volume (or size) can be then used to
obtain particle size distribution.
Figure 1. Schematic of a Coulter Counter.
A typical measurement using Coulter
Counter takes less than a minute as
counting and sizing rates of up to 10,000
particles per second are possible. The
accuracy of the size measurements can
be better than 1%. Aperture size typically
ranges from 15 µm to 2000 µm.
Each aperture can be used to measure
particles within a size range of 2%
to 60% of its nominal diameter. Therefore,
the overall particle size range of 0.4
µm to 1200 µm is possible.
The ability of the technology to analyze
particles is limited to those particles
that can be suitably suspended in an
electrolyte solution. The upper limit
therefore may be 500 µm for sand
but only 75 µm for tungsten carbide
particles. The lower size limit is restricted
by electronic noise generated mainly
within the aperture itself. The selection
of the most suitable aperture size is
dependent upon the particles to be measured.
If the sample to be measured is composed
of particles largely within a 30:1 diameter
size range, the most suitable aperture
can be chosen. For example, a 30 µm
aperture can measure particles from
about 0.6 to 18 µm in diameter.
A 140 µm aperture can measure
particles from about 2.8 to 84 µm.
If the particles to be measured cover
a wider range than a single aperture
can measure, two or more apertures have
to be used and the test results can
be overlapped to provide a complete
particle size distribution.